Below is a comparison of CI/CD tools provided by Azure, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and AWS in a table format.
Feature | Azure DevOps | Google Cloud Build | AWS CodePipeline |
---|---|---|---|
Type of Service | Integrated CI/CD platform | CI/CD as a Service | CI/CD as a Service |
Configuration as Code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Pipeline Definition | YAML (Azure Pipelines) | YAML (cloudbuild.yaml) | JSON or YAML |
Parallel Builds | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Native Integration with SCM | Yes (Azure Repos, GitHub, Bitbucket) | Yes (Cloud Source Repositories, GitHub) | Yes (CodeCommit, GitHub, Bitbucket) |
Docker Support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Artifact Management | Integrated (Azure Artifacts) | Cloud Storage Buckets | S3 Buckets, Artifactory |
Built-in CI/CD Templates | Yes (Azure DevOps Starter) | Yes | Yes |
Trigger Options | Webhooks, CI/CD Triggers | Cloud Build Triggers, GitHub Triggers | Webhooks, Polling, CloudWatch Events |
Scalability | Highly Scalable | Scalable | Scalable |
Community Support | Active Community | Active Community | Active Community |
Ease of Use | User-Friendly Interface | Intuitive Dashboard | User-Friendly Interface |
Extensibility | Extensions Marketplace | Limited Marketplace | Integrations Available |
Pricing Model | Free for Basic Usage, Paid Plans | Pay-as-you-go | Pay-as-you-go |
Managed Service Option | Yes (Azure DevOps Service) | Yes (Cloud Build) | No |
Notes:
- For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the respective documentation of each tool.
- The categorization of features may vary based on the specific use case or requirements.